|
Statements of Accounting Standards
(AS 19)
Leases
(In this Accounting Standard, the
standard portions have been set in bold italic type. These
should be read in the context of the background material which
has been set in normal type, and in the context of the ‘Preface
to the Statements of Accounting Standards’.)
The following is the text of Accounting
Standard (AS) 19, ‘Leases’, issued by the Council of the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India. This Standard comes into effect
in respect of all assets leased during accounting periods commencing
on or after 1.4.2001 and is mandatory in nature from that date.
Accordingly, the ‘Guidance Note on Accounting for Leases’ issued
by the Institute in 1995, is not applicable in respect of such
assets. Earlier application of this Standard is, however, encouraged.
Objective
The objective of this Statement is
to prescribe, for lessees and lessors, the appropriate accounting
policies and disclosures in relation to finance leases and operating
leases.
Scope
1. This Statement should be
applied in accounting for all leases other than:
- lease agreements to explore for or use
natural resources, such as oil, gas, timber, metals and other
mineral rights; and
- licensing agreements for items such as
motion picture films, video recordings, plays, manuscripts,
patents and copyrights; and
- lease agreements to use lands.
2. This Statement applies to agreements
that transfer the right to use assets even though substantial
services by the lessor may be called for in connection with the
operation or maintenance of such assets. On the other hand, this
Statement does not apply to agreements that are contracts for
services that do not transfer the right to use assets from one
contracting party to the other.
Definitions
3.
The following terms are used in this Statement with the meanings
specified:
A lease is an agreement whereby the lessor
conveys to the lessee in return for a payment or series of payments
the right to use an asset for an agreed period of time.
A finance lease is a lease that transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership
of an asset.
An operating lease is a lease other than
a finance lease.
A non-cancellable lease is a lease that is
cancellable only:
- upon
the occurrence of some remote contingency; or
- with
the permission of the lessor; or
- if
the lessee enters into a new lease for the same or an equivalent
asset with the same lessor; or
- upon
payment by the lessee of an additional amount such that, at
inception, continuation of the lease is reasonably certain.
The
inception of the lease is the earlier of the date of the
lease agreement and the date of a commitment by the parties to
the principal provisions of the lease.
The lease term is the non-cancellable period for which
the lessee has agreed to take on lease the asset together with
any further periods for which the lessee has the option to continue
the lease of the asset, with or without further payment, which
option at the inception of the lease it is reasonably certain
that the lessee will exercise.
Minimum lease payments are the payments over the lease
term that the lessee is, or can be required, to make excluding
contingent rent, costs for services and taxes to be paid by and
reimbursed to the lessor, together with:
- in
the case of the lessee, any residual value guaranteed by or
on behalf of the lessee; or
- in
the case of the lessor, any residual value guaranteed to the
lessor:
- by
or on behalf of the lessee; or
- by
an independent third party financially capable of meeting
this guarantee.
However,
if the lessee has an option to purchase the asset at a price
which is expected to be sufficiently lower than the fair value
at the date the option becomes exercisable that, at the inception
of the lease, is reasonably certain to be exercised, the minimum
lease payments comprise minimum payments payable over the
lease term and the payment required to exercise this purchase
option.
Fair
value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged
or a liability settled between knowledgeable, willing parties
in an arm's length transaction.
Economic
life is either:
- the
period over which an asset is expected to be economically usable
by one or more users; or
- the
number of production or similar units expected to be obtained
from the asset by one or more users.
Useful
life of a leased asset is either:
- the
period over which the leased asset is expected to be used by
the lessee; or
- the
number of production or similar units expected to be obtained
from the use of the asset by the lessee.
Residual
value of a leased asset is the estimated fair value of the
asset at the end of the lease term.
Guaranteed
residual value is:
- in
the case of the lessee, that part of the residual value which
is guaranteed by the lessee or by a party on behalf of the lessee
(the amount of the guarantee being the maximum amount that could,
in any event, become payable); and
- in
the case of the lessor, that part of the residual value which
is guaranteed by or on behalf of the lessee, or by an independent
third party who is financially capable of discharging the obligations
under the guarantee.
Unguaranteed
residual value of a leased asset is the amount by which the
residual value of the asset exceeds its guaranteed residual value.
Gross
investment in the lease is the aggregate of the minimum lease
payments under a finance lease from the standpoint of the lessor
and any unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor.
Unearned
finance income is the difference between:
- the
gross investment in the lease; and
- the
present value of
- the
minimum lease payments under a finance lease from the standpoint
of the lessor; and
- any
unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor, at the
interest rate implicit in the lease.
Net
investment in the lease is the gross investment in the lease
less unearned finance income.
The
interest rate implicit in the lease is the discount rate
that, at the inception of the lease, causes the aggregate present
value of
- the
minimum lease payments under a finance lease from the standpoint
of the lessor; and
- any
unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor, to be equal
to the fair value of the leased asset.
The
lessee's incremental borrowing rate of interest is the
rate of interest the lessee would have to pay on a similar lease
or, if that is not determinable, the rate that, at the inception
of the lease, the lessee would incur to borrow over a similar
term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to purchase
the asset.
Contingent
rent is that portion of the lease payments that is not fixed
in amount but is based on a factor other than just the passage
of time (e.g., percentage of sales, amount of usage, price indices,
market rates of interest).
4.
The definition of a lease includes agreements for the hire of
an asset which contain a provision giving the hirer an option
to acquire title to the asset upon the fulfillment of agreed conditions.
These agreements are commonly known as hire purchase agreements.
Hire purchase agreements include agreements under which the property
in the asset is to pass to the hirer on the payment of the last
instalment and the hirer has a right to terminate the agreement
at any time before the property so passes.
Classification
of Leases
5.
The classification of leases adopted in this Statement is based
on the extent to which risks and rewards incident to ownership
of a leased asset lie with the lessor or the lessee. Risks include
the possibilities of losses from idle capacity or technological
obsolescence and of variations in return due to changing economic
conditions. Rewards may be represented by the expectation of profitable
operation over the economic life of the asset and of gain from
appreciation in value or realisation of residual value.
6. A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially
all the risks and rewards incident to ownership. Title may or
may not eventually be transferred. A lease is classified as an
operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the
risks and rewards incident to ownership.
7. Since the transaction between a lessor and a lessee is based
on a lease agreement common to both parties, it is appropriate
to use consistent definitions. The application of these definitions
to the differing circumstances of the two parties may sometimes
result in the same lease being classified differently by the lessor
and the lessee.
8. Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends
on the substance of the transaction rather than its form. Examples
of situations which would normally lead to a lease being classified
as a finance lease are:
- the
lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the
end of the lease term;
- the
lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which
is expected to be sufficiently lower than the fair value at
the date the option becomes exercisable such that, at the inception
of the lease, it is reasonably certain that the option will
be exercised;
- the
lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the
asset even if title is not transferred;
- at
the inception of the lease the present value of the minimum
lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the
fair value of the leased asset; and
- the
leased asset is of a specialised nature such that only the lessee
can use it without major modifications being made.
9.
Indicators of situations which individually or in combination
could also lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease
are:
- if
the lessee can cancel the lease, the lessor's losses associated
with the cancellation are borne by the lessee;
- gains
or losses from the fluctuation in the fair value of the residual
fall to the lessee (for example in the form of a rent rebate
equalling most of the sales proceeds at the end of the lease);
and
- the
lessee can continue the lease for a secondary period at a rent
which is substantially lower than market rent.
10.
Lease classification is made at the inception of the lease. If
at any time the lessee and the lessor agree to change the provisions
of the lease, other than by renewing the lease, in a manner that
would have resulted in a different classification of the lease
under the criteria in paragraphs 5 to 9 had the changed terms
been in effect at the inception of the lease, the revised agreement
is considered as a new agreement over its revised term. Changes
in estimates (for example, changes in estimates of the economic
life or of the residual value of the leased asset) or changes
in circumstances (for example, default by the lessee), however,
do not give rise to a new classification of a lease for accounting
purposes.
Leases
in the Financial Statements of Lessees
Finance
Leases
11.
At the inception of a finance lease, the lessee should recognise
the lease as an asset and a liability. Such recognition should
be at an amount equal to the fair value of the leased asset at
the inception of the lease. However, if the fair value of the
leased asset exceeds the present value of the minimum lease payments
from the standpoint of the lessee, the amount recorded as an asset
and a liability should be the present value of the minimum lease
payments from the standpoint of the lessee. In calculating the
present value of the minimum lease payments the discount rate
is the interest rate implicit in the lease, if this is practicable
to determine; if not, the lessee's incremental borrowing rate
should be used.
Example
(a) An enterprise (the lessee) acquires a machinery on lease
from a leasing company (the lessor) on January 1, 20X0.
The lease term covers the entire economic life of the machinery,
i.e. 3 years. The fair value of the machinery on January
1, 20X0 is Rs.2,35,500. The lease agreement requires the
lessee to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000 per year beginning
December 31, 20X0. The lessee has guaranteed a residual
value of Rs.17,000 on December 31, 20X2 to the lessor. The
lessor, however, estimates that the machinery would have
a salvage value of only Rs.3,500 on December 31, 20X2.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 16 per cent (approx.).
This is calculated using the following formula: |
| Fair
value = |
ALR |
+
|
ALR |
+
|
............ |
+
|
ALR |
+
|
RV |
| (1+r)1 |
(1+r)2 |
|
(1+r)n |
(1+r)n |
where
ALR is annual lease rental,
RV is residual value (both guaranteed and unguaranteed),
n is the lease term,
r is interest rate implicit in the lease.
The present value of minimum lease payments from the stand
point of the lessee is Rs.2,35,500.
The lessee would record the machinery as an asset at Rs.2,35,500
with a corresponding liability representing the present
value of lease payments over the lease term (including the
guaranteed residual value).
(b) In the above example, suppose the lessor estimates that
the machinery would have a salvage value of Rs.17,000 on
December 31, 20X2. The lessee, however, guarantees a residual
value of Rs.5,000 only.
The interest rate implicit in the lease in this case would
remain unchanged at 16% (approx.). The present value of
the minimum lease payments from the standpoint of the lessee,
using this interest rate implicit in the lease, would be
Rs.2,27,805. As this amount is lower than the fair value
of the leased asset (Rs. 2,35,500), the lessee would recognise
the asset and the liability arising from the lease at Rs.2,27,805.
In case the interest rate implicit in the lease is not known
to the lessee, the present value of the minimum lease payments
from the standpoint of the lessee would be computed using
the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. |
12.
Transactions and other events are accounted for and presented
in accordance with their substance and financial reality and not
merely with their legal form. While the legal form of a lease
agreement is that the lessee may acquire no legal title to the
leased asset, in the case of finance leases the substance and
financial reality are that the lessee acquires the economic benefits
of the use of the leased asset for the major part of its economic
life in return for entering into an obligation to pay for that
right an amount approximating to the fair value of the asset and
the related finance charge.
13.
If such lease transactions are not reflected in the lessee's balance
sheet, the economic resources and the level of obligations of
an enterprise are understated thereby distorting financial ratios.
It is therefore appropriate that a finance lease be recognised
in the lessee's balance sheet both as an asset and as an obligation
to pay future lease payments. At the inception of the lease, the
asset and the liability for the future lease payments are recognised
in the balance sheet at the same amounts.
14.
It is not appropriate to present the liability for a leased asset
as a deduction from the leased asset in the financial statements.
The liability for a leased asset should be presented separately
in the balance sheet as a current liability or a long-term liability
as the case may be.
15. Initial direct costs are often incurred in connection with
specific leasing activities, as in negotiating and securing leasing
arrangements. The costs identified as directly attributable to
activities performed by the lessee for a finance lease are included
as part of the amount recognised as an asset under the lease.
16.
Lease payments should be apportioned between the finance charge
and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge
should be allocated to periods during the lease term so as to
produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining
balance of the liability for each period.
Example
In the example (a) illustrating
paragraph 11, the lease payments would be apportioned
by the lessee between the finance charge and the reduction
of the outstanding liability as follows.
|
| Year |
Finance
charge
(Rs.) |
Payment
(Rs.) |
Reduction
in
outstanding
liability (Rs.) |
Outstanding
liability
(Rs.) |
| Year
1 |
(January
1) |
|
|
|
2,35,500 |
| |
(December
31) |
37,680 |
1,00,000 |
62,320 |
1,73,180 |
| Year
2 |
(December
31) |
27,709 |
1,00,000 |
72,291 |
1,00,889 |
| Year
3 |
(December
31) |
16,142 |
1,00,000 |
83,858 |
17,031* |
17.
In practice, in allocating the finance charge to periods during
the lease term, some form of approximation may be used to simplify
the calculation.
18.
A finance lease gives rise to a depreciation expense for the asset
as well as a finance expense for each accounting period. The depreciation
policy for a leased asset should be consistent with that for depreciable
assets which are owned, and the depreciation recognised should
be calculated on the basis set out in Accounting Standard (AS)
6, Depreciation Accounting. If there is no reasonable certainty
that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease
term, the asset should be fully depreciated over the lease term
or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
19.
The depreciable amount of a leased asset is allocated to each
accounting period during the period of expected use on a systematic
basis consistent with the depreciation policy the lessee adopts
for depreciable assets that are owned. If there is reasonable
certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of
the lease term, the period of expected use is the useful life
of the asset; otherwise the asset is depreciated over the lease
term or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
20. The sum of the depreciation expense for the asset and the
finance expense for the period is rarely the same as the lease
payments payable for the period, and it is, therefore, inappropriate
simply to recognise the lease payments payable as an expense in
the statement of profit and loss. Accordingly, the asset and the
related liability are unlikely to be equal in amount after the
inception of the lease.
21. To determine whether a leased asset has become impaired, an
enterprise applies the Accounting Standard dealing with impairment
of assets, that sets out the requirements as to how an enterprise
should perform the review of the carrying amount of an asset,
how it should determine the recoverable amount of an asset and
when it should recognise, or reverse, an impairment loss.
22.
The lessee should, in addition to the requirements of AS 10, Accounting
for Fixed Assets, AS 6, Depreciation Accounting, and the governing
statute, make the following disclosures for finance leases:
- assets
acquired under finance lease as segregated from the assets owned;
- for
each class of assets, the net carrying amount at the balance
sheet date;
- a
reconciliation between the total of minimum lease payments at
the balance sheet date and their present value. In addition,
an enterprise should disclose the total of minimum lease payments
at the balance sheet date, and their present value, for each
of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- (iii)
later than five years;
- contingent
rents recognised as income in the statement of profit and loss
for the period;
- the
total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received
under non-cancellable subleases at the balance sheet date; and
- a
general description of the lessee's significant leasing arrangements
including, but not limited to, the following:
- the
basis on which contingent rent payments are determined;
- the
existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation
clauses; and
- restrictions
imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning
dividends, additional debt, and further leasing.
Operating
Leases
23.
Lease payments under an operating lease should be recognised
as an expense in the statement of profit and loss on a straight
line basis over the lease term unless another systematic basis
is more representative of the time pattern of the user's benefit.
24.
For operating leases, lease payments (excluding costs for
services such as insurance and maintenance) are recognised
as an expense in the statement of profit and loss on a straight
line basis unless another systematic basis is more representative
of the time pattern of the user's benefit, even if the payments
are not on that basis.
25.
The lessee should make the following disclosures for operating
leases:
- the
total of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable
operating leases for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- the
total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be
received under non-cancellable subleases at the balance
sheet date;
- lease
payments recognised in the statement of profit and loss
for the period, with separate amounts for minimum lease
payments and contingent rents;
- sub-lease
payments received (or receivable) recognised in the statement
of profit and loss for the period;
- a
general description of the lessee's significant leasing
arrangements including, but not limited to, the following:
- the
basis on which contingent rent payments are determined;
- the
existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and
escalation clauses; and
- restrictions
imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning
dividends, additional debt, and further leasing.
Leases
in the Financial Statements of Lessors
Finance
Leases
26.
The lessor should recognise assets given under a finance lease
in its balance sheet as a receivable at an amount equal to
the net investment in the lease.
27.
Under a finance lease substantially all the risks and rewards
incident to legal ownership are transferred by the lessor,
and thus the lease payment receivable is treated by the lessor
as repayment of principal, i.e., net investment in the lease,
and finance income to reimburse and reward the lessor for
its investment and services.
28.
The recognition of finance income should be based on a pattern
reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment
of the lessor outstanding in respect of the finance lease.
29.
A lessor aims to allocate finance income over the lease term
on a systematic and rational basis. This income allocation
is based on a pattern reflecting a constant periodic return
on the net investment of the lessor outstanding in respect
of the finance lease. Lease payments relating to the accounting
period, excluding costs for services, are reduced from both
the principal and the unearned finance income.
30. Estimated unguaranteed residual values used in computing
the lessor's gross investment in a lease are reviewed regularly.
If there has been a reduction in the estimated unguaranteed
residual value, the income allocation over the remaining lease
term is revised and any reduction in respect of amounts already
accrued is recognised immediately. An upward adjustment of
the estimated residual value is not made.
31. Initial direct costs, such as commissions and legal fees,
are often incurred by lessors in negotiating and arranging
a lease. For finance leases, these initial direct costs are
incurred to produce finance income and are either recognised
immediately in the statement of profit and loss or allocated
against the finance income over the lease term.
32.
The manufacturer or dealer lessor should recognise the transaction
of sale in the statement of profit and loss for the period,
in accordance with the policy followed by the enterprise for
outright sales. If artificially low rates of interest are
quoted, profit on sale should be restricted to that which
would apply if a commercial rate of interest were charged.
Initial direct costs should be recognised as an expense in
the statement of profit and loss at the inception of the lease.
33.
Manufacturers or dealers may offer to customers the choice
of either buying or leasing an asset. A finance lease of an
asset by a manufacturer or dealer lessor gives rise to two
types of income:
(a)
the profit or loss equivalent to the profit or loss resulting
from an outright sale of the asset being leased, at normal
selling prices, reflecting any applicable volume or trade
discounts; and
(b) the finance income over the lease term.
34.
The sales revenue recorded at the commencement of a finance
lease term by a manufacturer or dealer lessor is the fair
value of the asset. However, if the present value of the minimum
lease payments accruing to the lessor computed at a commercial
rate of interest is lower than the fair value, the amount
recorded as sales revenue is the present value so computed.
The cost of sale recognised at the commencement of the lease
term is the cost, or carrying amount if different, of the
leased asset less the present value of the unguaranteed residual
value. The difference between the sales revenue and the cost
of sale is the selling profit, which is recognised in accordance
with the policy followed by the enterprise for sales.
35. Manufacturer or dealer lessors sometimes quote artificially
low rates of interest in order to attract customers. The use
of such a rate would result in an excessive portion of the
total income from the transaction being recognised at the
time of sale. If artificially low rates of interest are quoted,
selling profit would be restricted to that which would apply
if a commercial rate of interest were charged.
36. Initial direct costs are recognised as an expense at the
commencement of the lease term because they are mainly related
to earning the manufacturer's or dealer's selling profit.
37.
The lessor should make the following disclosures for finance
leases:
- a
reconciliation between the total gross investment in the
lease at the balance sheet date, and the present value of
minimum lease payments receivable at the balance sheet date.
In addition, an enterprise should disclose the total gross
investment in the lease and the present value of minimum
lease payments receivable at the balance sheet date, for
each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- unearned
finance income;
- the
unguaranteed residual values accruing to the benefit of
the lessor;
- the
accumulated provision for uncollectible minimum lease payments
receivable;
- contingent
rents recognised in the statement of profit and loss for
the period;
- a
general description of the significant leasing arrangements
of the lessor; and
- accounting
policy adopted in respect of initial direct costs.
38.
As an indicator of growth it is often useful to also disclose
the gross investment less unearned income in new business
added during the accounting period, after deducting the relevant
amounts for cancelled leases.
Operating
Leases
39.
The lessor should present an asset given under operating lease
in its balance sheet under fixed assets.
40. Lease income from operating leases should be recognised
in the statement of profit and loss on a straight line basis
over the lease term, unless another systematic basis is more
representative of the time pattern in which benefit derived
from the use of the leased asset is diminished.
41.
Costs, including depreciation, incurred in earning the lease
income are recognised as an expense. Lease income (excluding
receipts for services provided such as insurance and maintenance)
is recognised in the statement of profit and loss on a straight
line basis over the lease term even if the receipts are not
on such a basis, unless another systematic basis is more representative
of the time pattern in which benefit derived from the use
of the leased asset is diminished.
42. Initial direct costs incurred specifically to earn revenues
from an operating lease are either deferred and allocated
to income over the lease term in proportion to the recognition
of rent income, or are recognised as an expense in the statement
of profit and loss in the period in which they are incurred.
43.
The depreciation of leased assets should be on a basis consistent
with the normal depreciation policy of the lessor for similar
assets, and the depreciation charge should be calculated on
the basis set out in AS 6, Depreciation Accounting.
44.
To determine whether a leased asset has become impaired, an
enterprise applies the Accounting Standard dealing with impairment
of assets that sets out the requirements for how an enterprise
should perform the review of the carrying amount of an asset,
how it should determine the recoverable amount of an asset
and when it should recognise, or reverse, an impairment loss.
45. A manufacturer or dealer lessor does not recognise any
selling profit on entering into an operating lease because
it is not the equivalent of a sale.
46.
The lessor should, in addition to the requirements of AS 6,
Depreciation Accounting and AS 10, Accounting for Fixed Assets,
and the governing statute, make the following disclosures
for operating leases:
- for
each class of assets, the gross carrying amount, the accumulated
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses at the balance
sheet date; and
- the
depreciation recognised in the statement of profit and
loss for the period;
- impairment
losses recognised in the statement of profit and loss
for the period;
- impairment
losses reversed in the statement of profit and loss
for the period;
- the
future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating
leases in the aggregate and for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- total
contingent rents recognised as income in the statement of
profit and loss for the period;
- a
general description of the lessor's significant leasing
arrangements; and
- accounting
policy adopted in respect of initial direct costs.
Sale
and Leaseback Transactions
47.
A sale and leaseback transaction involves the sale of an asset
by the vendor and the leasing of the same asset back to the vendor.
The lease payments and the sale price are usually interdependent
as they are negotiated as a package. The accounting treatment
of a sale and leaseback transaction depends upon the type of lease
involved.
48. If a sale and leaseback transaction results in a finance
lease, any excess or deficiency of sales proceeds over the carrying
amount should not be immediately recognised as income or loss
in the financial statements of a seller-lessee. Instead, it should
be deferred and amortised over the lease term in proportion to
the depreciation of the leased asset.
49. If the leaseback is a finance lease, it is not appropriate
to regard an excess of sales proceeds over the carrying amount
as income. Such excess is deferred and amortised over the lease
term in proportion to the depreciation of the leased asset. Similarly,
it is not appropriate to regard a deficiency as loss. Such deficiency
is deferred and amortised over the lease term.
50. If a sale and leaseback transaction results in an operating
lease, and it is clear that the transaction is established at
fair value, any profit or loss should be recognised immediately.
If the sale price is below fair value, any profit or loss should
be recognised immediately except that, if the loss is compensated
by future lease payments at below market price, it should be deferred
and amortised in proportion to the lease payments over the period
for which the asset is expected to be used. If the sale price
is above fair value, the excess over fair value should be deferred
and amortised over the period for which the asset is expected
to be used.
51. If the leaseback is an operating lease, and the lease payments
and the sale price are established at fair value, there has in
effect been a normal sale transaction and any profit or loss is
recognised immediately.
52. For operating leases, if the fair value at the time of
a sale and leaseback transaction is less than the carrying amount
of the asset, a loss equal to the amount of the difference between
the carrying amount and fair value should be recognised immediately.
53. For finance leases, no such adjustment is necessary unless
there has been an impairment in value, in which case the carrying
amount is reduced to recoverable amount in accordance with the
Accounting Standard dealing with impairment of assets.
54. Disclosure requirements for lessees and lessors apply equally
to sale and leaseback transactions. The required description of
the significant leasing arrangements leads to disclosure of unique
or unusual provisions of the agreement or terms of the sale and
leaseback transactions..
55. Sale and leaseback transactions may meet the separate disclosure
criteria set out in paragraph 12 of Accounting Standard (AS) 5,
Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes
in Accounting Policies..
Appendix
Sale
and Leaseback Transactions that Result in Operating Leases
The
appendix is illustrative only and does not form part of the accounting
standard. The purpose of this appendix is to illustrate the application
of the accounting standard.
A sale and leaseback transaction that results in an operating
lease may give rise to profit or a loss, the determination and
treatment of which depends on the leased asset's carrying amount,
fair value and selling price. The following table shows the requirements
of the accounting standard in various circumstances.
| Sale
price established at fair value (paragraph 50)
|
Carrying
amount equal to fair value |
Carrying
amount less than fair value |
Carrying
amount above fair value |
| |
|
|
|
| Profit |
No
profit |
Recognise
profit immediately |
Not
applicable |
| Loss |
No
loss |
Not
applicable |
Recognise
loss immediately |
| Sale
price below fair value (paragraph 50) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Profit
|
No
profit |
Recognise
profit immediately |
No
profit (note 1) |
| Loss
not compensated by future lease payments at below market
price |
Recognise
loss immediately |
Recognise
loss immediately |
(note
1) |
| Loss
compensated by future lease payments at below market price
|
Defer
and amortise loss |
Defer
and amortise loss |
(note
1) |
| Sale
price above fair value (paragraph 50) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Profit
|
Defer
and amortise profit |
Defer
and amortise profit |
Defer
and amortise profit (note 2) |
| Loss
|
No
loss |
No
loss |
(note
1) |
Note 1. These parts of the table
represent circumstances that would have been dealt with under
paragraph 52 of the Standard. Paragraph 52 requires the carrying
amount of an asset to be written down to fair value where it is
subject to a sale and leaseback.
Note 2. The profit would be the difference between fair value
and sale price as the carrying amount would have been written
down to fair value in accordance with paragraph 52.
|